Vanguard launches low-cost high-yield ETF VCHY
Vanguard launched the Vanguard U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (VCHY) in June with a 0.05% expense ratio. VettaFi’s Todd Rosenbluth named it ETF of the Week.
Vanguard introduced the Vanguard U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (VCHY) in June. The fund provides index exposure to U.S. high-yield corporate bonds and carries a 0.05% expense ratio.
Todd Rosenbluth, head of research at VettaFi, highlighted the fund during a June interview and identified it as ETF of the Week. He noted that VCHY arrived as investor flows into high-yield ETFs recovered in June after five months of net outflows.
Rosenbluth pointed out that Vanguard had not previously offered an index-based product dedicated to U.S. high-yield corporate bonds. He emphasized the low fee, repeating the fund’s charge as “five basis points. That’s the fee for this.” The fee places VCHY among the cheapest options within the high-yield ETF category.
Fee comparisons: the average active high-yield fund and ETF charges about 0.50% (50 basis points). The overall category average is about 0.24% (24 basis points). Vanguard also offers an actively managed high-yield ETF, VGHY, which carries a 0.22% expense ratio and held roughly $300 million in assets at the time of the conversation. VCHY was newly launched and showed about $100,000 in assets at that time.
Rosenbluth described the differences between index and active approaches. An index ETF like VCHY provides broad market exposure at low cost. Active managers can change credit exposure and select individual securities to try to add value or reduce risk. He said VCHY’s benchmark has a higher weighting in BB-rated bonds than in B-rated bonds and that the ETF was offering a yield near 5% after fees.
Because VCHY is new, trading volumes are relatively light and bid-ask spreads may be wider than for established funds. Rosenbluth observed that Vanguard has a history of supporting its index products and that closures are rare, but investors should consider how much they plan to allocate relative to the fund’s daily trading activity. He also urged attention to tax and transaction costs when switching from existing holdings.
On portfolio use, Rosenbluth suggested VCHY can serve as a low-cost complement to a core fixed-income allocation that lacks high-yield exposure. He compared it to a total bond market index that holds only investment-grade bonds and noted that VCHY could add diversification for investors without any junk-bond exposure. For investors already holding high-yield in a mutual fund or a higher-cost ETF, VCHY may offer a lower-cost, more tax-efficient alternative, subject to tax consequences and overall portfolio fit.
The fund’s entry increases index-based options in the high-yield segment and presents a low-fee benchmark alternative to many active strategies.








