Goldman Sachs GTEK ETF Outpaces Peers With Active Strategy

Goldman Sachs’ active tech ETF GTEK has gained 45.2% YTD and 68.2% over 12 months, outpacing Technology Equities peers while avoiding megacap holdings and clearing key moving averages.

The Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF, ticker GTEK, returned 45.2% year-to-date and 68.2% over the past 12 months, figures shown in fund data. Those results exceeded the average returns of its Technology Equities category in the same periods, according to market-data providers.

GTEK is run as an actively managed, growth-oriented ETF. Fund managers use a bottom-up selection process and take concentrated positions in companies they identify as high conviction. The strategy deliberately excludes many megacap technology names that dominate cap-weighted benchmarks and broad investor portfolios.

The ETF’s remit allows investments beyond traditional software and hardware companies. Holdings may include communications and health care firms where managers see material technology exposure. Managers screen potential positions for metrics such as sustainable free cash flow and other financial measures tied to growth and durability.

On the technical side, the ETF’s price moved above both the 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages in the spring. Market technicians view a crossover above those moving averages as a common bullish indicator used in chart analysis.

GTEK charges an expense ratio of 0.75%. The fee reflects active stock selection and concentrated positioning that can produce returns different from broad market tech benchmarks. The fund is one of several actively managed ETFs in Goldman Sachs’ lineup and its recent returns have prompted monitoring by investors and analysts focused on sector rotation and active management performance.

Fund data indicates the recent gains stem from the ETF’s stock selection and sector allocations rather than exposure to a handful of large-cap names. Managers continue to apply their bottom-up criteria when adjusting holdings and portfolio weights.

Articles by this author